> > Yes, but that way one has to delete the markers every time by hand if one > > wants to cut away begin/end (and if that markers are set per default). > > Close but no cigar :-) > > Of course the markers won't be set *explicitly*. The logic behind that > would be somewhat like this: > > 1. if there is no stop marker at the end of the list, assume EOF > 2. if there is no start marker at the beginning, assume BOF > > That is, if there are no markers at all, assume BOF->EOF. > > But I'm still reluctant to add it because it's a little non-obvious > (read: counter-intuitive). >
I remember, ... we already had that discussion concerning the last-frame-problem... and I also opted for the dummy-frame solution that time! Now, with that "batch convert"-feature in mind, I would really do both!!! A dummy frame for the ones, who intuitively set a marker at EOF and the automatic (counter-intuitive in terms of closed marker pairs BUT maybe intuitive in terms of batch-convert) stuff for the insiders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ DVBCUT-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvbcut-user
