Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> If the user edits a file, and then renames it, and then runs >>> dvc-status, won't it show up as 'missing old-name' and 'unknown new-name'? >> >> Depending on whether the user ran "XXX mv old-name new-name" to >> actually rename the file. > > Right. > > I (and members of my team at work) can't be bothered to remember to do > that; I want to edit files "just like I used to without this fancy CM > system", and expect DVC to remind me of what needs to be done. > > But clearly DVC needs to handle all such cases. > >> But even if we use a singleton 99% of the time, we should not restrict >> the model to singletons. Using a list is probably not more >> difficult. > > Right. > > This is getting into a lot of patching. I suspect it would be better > if I had a public database (if that's the right term for bzr) > somewhere, that you could pull from. > > I have a website, but I'd have to pay more to set up a bzr server > there. I can do that, but is there another option?
ftp or sftp access to your website is enough. I publish my bzr repository via ftp and it is accessible via http. You can push your patches to your website. When you have a version that is stable enough, I can merge your changes. You could even setup different branches for different features if that is required/useful. Stefan. _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
