Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I think Christian added `#' in order to improve byte-compiling, but > I don't think it means anything in this case, since the function is a > symbol, not a list.
That's my feeling too. Note also that people sometimes write #'(lambda (...) ...) But in elisp, that's strictly equivalent to (lambda (...) ...) since `lambda' is a macro that does simply (defmacro lambda (&rest cdr) (list 'function (cons 'lambda cdr))) In general, I'd say the # is useless in emacs-lisp, but there might be counter-examples. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
