Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's what it should output with my prefered notation: > > rename_target b_file > from file_b > modified file_a > rename_source file_b > to b_file
OK, if Monotone is not going to group files according to how they are changed, then I guess it makes sense to use rename_target and rename_source, so feel free to make that change, as long as it doesn't modify the "terse" method :^) . > I think that's clearer. I suppose just "rename" for each would also > work, as long as the "to" and "from" are shown: > > rename b_file > from file_b > modified file_a > rename file_b > to b_file This would confuse me because the same rename operation would be listed twice. I think better would be just to use rename_(target|source) or "rename (target|source)". -- | Michael Olson | FSF Associate Member #652 | | http://mwolson.org/ | Hobbies: Lisp, HCoop | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner | `-------------------------------------------------------'
pgpmu6TSIiCNU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
