Daniel Dehennin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le 5534 Septembre 1993, Stefan Reichör a envoyé: >> I am no license expert. But I think that all manual authors will >> agree to any license that will be free enough to have the manual >> included in debian. > > What about Emacs inclusion ? > > For Emacs inclusion we need to have an LGPL manual, isn't it ?
RMS definitely prefers the GFDL. I remember reading something to that effect when the Org manual was being talked about on the emacs-devel list. Carsten, what was the eventual outcome with the Debian package for Org and the licensing of the Org manual? -- | Michael Olson | FSF Associate Member #652 | | http://mwolson.org/ | Hobbies: Lisp, HCoop | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner | `-------------------------------------------------------' _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
