Michael Olson пишет: > > Following up, every single manual in Emacs' doc/misc directory is > licensed under GFDL, with no dual-licensing. It would be possible to > maintain a separately-licensed copy *outside* of the Emacs tree, but > we'd have to be very careful about not propagating changes verbatim from > one copy to the other, and get permission from every current copyright > holder, including myself. > Also find example dual licencing in Debian Reference Guide. From Debian Reference Contributor's Guide (debian-reference/manual.sgml):
> License > All contributions must be licensed under > both GPL and GFDL. > I know about the controversy surrounding the GFDL. > Please do not worry: I do not like GFDL either. > The dual licensing requirement is just > an extra safeguard that any part of this document may be combined > with any other part or with GFDL documents. > I consider even the GPL to be too restrictive and prefer the newer > BSD license, but I wanted the DR > to include bits from the Debian FAQ which is GPLed. > If there were only nice people in the world then we would not > need the GPL. > GFDL documentation may still be useful if it is high quality > document with partial freedom to everyone > while making publishing house happy. _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
