[email protected] wrote: > I'd just like to add to this that there are a vast myriad of reasons *not* to > allow people to see what someone's filters are and who are on those filters, > which seems to be what some people here are asking for.
However - I have another use case where you might want to explicitly make a group public - and controlled by the users. Some (maybe even a lot) of people have custom posting lists where they ask people if they want to be on their "cat photo" filter. They then have to follow comments/poll entries, add/remove people by hand, etc. to allow them access. What I'd really like is a watcher-editable trust-list. The interface would be incredibly simple: "You are looking at the user-info for AndrewDucker. He has three open posting lists. Would you like to subscribe to emo-poetry(X), Cat-Photos( ) or stargate-slash(X)" That way, people can simply use this interface and never see my Emo poetry ever again, while still happily reading my Stargate slash. Thoughts? Andy _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
