On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:11PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote: > On 11/22/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Actually my favorit 'solution' to this problem would be, > >dropping the weights at all and don't touching the global client > >order. This seems to be more predictable (it also was the case > >until 0.9 afair). Though there are corner-cases as well, because > >zooming a multi-tagged client will zoom it in all tags it is > >tagged - when viewed. But to me this seems more natural after > >all. > > > >Actually I pushed this thing, it removes 40 lines, check hg tip > >if you like it ;) > > I think that's indeed more predictable. Also, let's not forget that > tags != workspaces. Caching views wouldn't be the way to go I believe.
I agree, hg tip feels much better compared to dwm-2.2's reorder()'ed tiling (besides this, it uses lesser CPU cycles). Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
