Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-01-08, 15:34): > > My first impression (from a user's POV) is that the splitting of master > > tag should occur only if there are more than two clients. If there are > > only two clients, one should be the in the master tag, the second in the > > stack. > > No that would be less flexible. The current way allows even > master-only arrangements which is quite useful for log-analyzing > (at least in the use cases I used it just some hours ago).
Yeah, you're probably right :). One just has to get used to it. > > Also, I think there should be an indicator whether the master is split > > (and perhaps with a number of its parts well). Like: > > > > [3]= > > > > instead of > > > > []= > > That looks like an interesting idea. I will think about it. And I think an indicator of some sort will make it easier (perhaps some quick visual clue instead of a number? like [***]=, just occured to me that it might be easier for quick communication. You just see the number, you don't have to read the arabic numeral :)). > > Otherwise -- thanks as usual for you work. BTW, how are the other > > projects going (like st)? > > st is on its way, but slower than excepted. The base is ready > (pts/pty handling, fork()'ing), but the drawing/rendering/window > creation stuff hasn't been implemented yet. Good luck with that -- it is truly a lot of work (and a lot of legacy to deal with, I suppose). [a] -- . Antoni Grzymala - antoni (at) chopin.edu.pl -------------------. | OpenPGP KeyID EB315583 available now from a keyserver near you | | Fingerprint A819 6D2E D5EB D9E0 D2D9 7AF6 2FAF 4A11 EB31 5583 | `----------------------------------------------------------------'
