On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:14:50AM +0000, Tener Hades wrote: > On 2007-01-08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:57:02PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > >> And I think an indicator of some sort will make it easier (perhaps some > >> quick visual clue instead of a number? like [***]=, just occured to me > >> that it might be easier for quick communication. You just see the > >> number, you don't have to read the arabic numeral :)). > > > > Don't make the things too complex. I changed hg tip accordingly > > to allow the following: > > > > #define TILESYMBOL "[%u]=" > > > > Now the mode label is rendered based on the newly introduced > > mtext, which is updated whenever nmaster or arrange changes as > > follows: > > > > snprintf(mtext, sizeof mtext, arrange == dofloat ? FLOATSYMBOL : > > TILESYMBOL, nmaster); > > > > This change will be part of the dwm-3.0 release. > > > > Regards, > > Semi-OT: Does dwm-2.[89] compile with X11R7? If not, that's something > I'd like to see in 3.0. I want to make a complete switch to X11R7, but > I refuse to leave dwm/dmenu behind.
I use x.org 7.1.1 without any problem for months. Don't get confused by the libxcb thread! > Also, I'd really enjoy the functionality of 2.9/3.0 in regard to the > nmaster and mtext changes, but I'm hesitant to update because I prefer > the bottom stack to the tiled. So, I'd like to know 1.) if the bottom > stack patch will be implemented with these changes in mind, and 2.) > how? "[%u]TTT" or "=[%u]=" or similar? Will the master area be split > vertically/horizontally/both depending on landscape/portrait? I'm not sure the wide layout patch is still necessary. Anyways if it's maintained as a patch in the future I believe it should support the nmaster feature. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
