Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-10, 10:18): > > I think this discussion is going in the right direction. My suggestion > > to marry those two contradicting views would be like this: > > > > - in normal circumstances two heads act like two separate dwm instances > > (the way I guess most people are doing now), you can jump between them > > the usual way (ie. sh -c 'DISPLAY=:0.1 swarp 512 384'); > > > > - both heads have their own freely settable sets of tags (like two > > separate dwm instances); > > > > - add another property to a client (called head, for example), > > signifying which head a client should appear on (mutually exclusive, > > so that we don't try do display a client on both heads; > > > > - allow changing the "head" property for a client with a keyboard-bound > > function while preserving other attributes of the client (tagset, > > float/non-float); > > > > Do you think this makes sense? > > Yes, Christof Musik currently works on something like that. We > specified a good multihead concept during last weekend and I > believe you will like it!
Cool! I currently have only one monitor (the one in my laptop), but I'm planning to buy an external one when I have some spare funds. Regards, -- [a]
signature.asc
Description: Podpis cyfrowy :: Digital signature
