On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:49:19PM -0400, Ralph E. Carter wrote: > ---------------------------------------- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:38:06 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff > > > >> To grow/shrink the master area, you could reuse this approach as > >> follows: > >> > >> DEFGEOM(growmaster, bx, by, bw, wx, wy, ww, wh, mx, my, \ > >> mw+=20, mh, tx, ty, tw-=20, th, mox, moy, mow, moh) > >> DEFGEOM(shrinkmaster, bx, by, bw, wx, wy, ww, wh, mx, my, \ > >> mw-=20, mh, tx, ty, tw+=20, th, mox, moy, mow, moh) > >> > >> { "+|", growmaster }, > >> { "|-", shrinkmaster }, > >> > >> { MODKEY, XK_h, setgeom, "|-" }, > >> { MODKEY, XK_l, setgeom, "+|" }, > > > > It is not very important, but the right GEOM definition for growmaster and > > shrinkmaster should be: > > > > DEFGEOM(shrinkmaster, bx, by, bw, wx, wy, ww, wh, mx, my, \ > > mw-=20, mh, tx-=20, ty, tw+=20, th, mox, moy, mow, moh) > > DEFGEOM(growmaster, bx, by, bw, wx, wy, ww, wh, mx, my, \ > > mw+=20, mh, tx+=20, ty, tw-=20, th, mox, moy, mow, moh) > > > > And, of course, nice work!! I really like the new geometries concept. > > > Right. This fixed mine. Thanks.
Well, sorry, I hacked it untested into my mail. I have two similiar definitions as a sample in hg tip. However, I pretty much recommend not using shrink/grow in this way, but to stick to some usual geometries, with a bigger and with a smaller master area, and maybe a geometry with a hidden bar. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
