On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it's not very general. If you use bottom stack, then > > growm() should touch mh, th and ty instead. With DEFGEOM this is > > possible already. Having a growm() function like your proposal > > is too limited in my opinion. > > the idea is that in this way it's a one liner in config.h > so i don't care much about limitations > > if one use bottom stack then one set mh only > if one use both bottom and right stack then one can check for geom > easily and set mw/mh accordingly
I care only about what should be mainstream and what not. And I think you understand my reasons why I won't like those oneliners being mainstream, if we already have DEFGEOM. At some point I decided that there should only be one way doing a certain thing... ;) Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
