On 9/7/08, Nicolas Martyanoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's quite explicit: the NULL macro expands to 0.
NULL macro does not necessaryly expands to 0, but this is basic knowledge look it up in the standard. what am i concerned about is the internal null pointer representation (which has nothing to do wether NULL is defined 0 or not) it is explicitely stated in c99 that there might be architectures where memset(&p, 0, sizeof(p)) is not equivalent to p=0;
