On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote:
> To: dwm@suckless.org
> From: henry atting <nspm...@literaturlatenight.de>
> Subject: [dwm]  Re: What happened here?
> Reply-To: dwm mail list <dwm@suckless.org>
> List-Id: dwm mail list <dwm.suckless.org>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaXw8qx3RxRmlkx9dQJG0B9fg4s=
> I recently switched from dwm to xmonad. 
> I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines.
> The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not
> very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match.

I don't see any "rigid" constraint, as for SLOC, we are now pretty far
from 2k SLOC as current dwm has ~1.5k SLOCs. I personaly see this limit
as only expression of something like: we don't want dbus etc etc.

> Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to configure
> xmonad, took me an hour or so to get things done.
> But on the other hand being no coder I do not fit into the dwm target
> group anyhow. ;)
> henry


Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/

Reply via email to