On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko <yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: >> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. > > what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM? > > regards, y0shi > >
Could be, that X doesn't allow it to be more unixy, and like I said, if you don't want to change the configuration, you could say dwm is just a simple window manager. But as the task for most people on this list is configuring it like crazy, I don't think one should consider dwm unixy in this use case, it's not flexible enough. Perhaps someone should write a window manager consisting of some very simple and small binaries. But I admit, I would not know where to start (I will stick to wmii and it's 9p server approach). just my 2 euros
