I agree too. The shimmy going from a one-client tag to a multi-client tag and back again is very distracting.
Jeremy On Thu 19 Feb 2009 - 02:57PM, Premysl Hruby wrote: > On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > To: dwm mail list <[email protected]> > > From: Anselm R Garbe <[email protected]> > > Subject: [dwm] Issues with border > > Reply-To: dwm mail list <[email protected]> > > List-Id: dwm mail list <dwm.suckless.org> > > > > Hi, > > > > I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client > > is in the view, reasons: > > > > - gained screen real eastate is very minimal > > - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(), > > if n is the number of clients in the view > > - corner cases for togglefloating() > > - I dislike adjustborder() altogether > > > > So my proposal is: reverting to old behavior (nonoborder), and for > > those who like it, use a config.h function like: > > > > void toggleborder(const Arg *arg) { > > borderpx = 1 - borderpx; > > arrange(); > > } > > > > And then define a key binding for it. > > > > Opinions? > > > > Kind regards, > > --Anselm > > > > I'm pro too, as I really dislike the noborder. > > -Ph > > -- > Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/ >
