Ok, I meant the following: Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@, and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be technically possible.
Kind regards, Anselm 2009/5/20 Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com>: > I think that's a sensible proposal, let's do it. > > For those who are subscribed already, there won't be a difference. The > new ones will subscribe to hackers. We will keep dwm@ and wmii@ > working, but direct it to hack...@. > > Kind regards, > Anselm > > 2009/5/20 markus schnalke <mei...@marmaro.de>: >> [2009-05-20 08:35] Uriel <urie...@gmail.com> >>> >>> I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both >>> lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a >>> single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for >>> 'offtopic' discussion. >> >> +1 >> >> >>> Right now when one has something to say that doesn't quite fit in >>> wmii@ or dwm@, or that could fit in both, you have to pick one list at >>> random, or to cross post, and both options suck. >> >>> > > What do you think about creating an offtopic mailing list in suckless >>> > > for >>> > > discussing such >>> > > kind of topics, instead of using the dwm@ one like nowadays happen. >>> > >>> > I think it's been the charme of dwm@ to discuss lot's of other things, >> >> Yes. Merge, don't split. >> >> >> meillo >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQFKE6ly6aFpZ+X9qBIRArW7AJ4sXPrq+pagoWmS2AKT032PSmqOTQCfXsgx >> b3yhcxM+v9dwI/Mo9IklZHU= >> =OWPz >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >
