Hi, 2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy <nszabo...@gmail.com>: > On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@, >> and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who >> are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on >> dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be technically possible. > > dwm, wmii -> hackers > hackers -> dwm, wmii > > so one sends a mail to dwm@ then it goes to hackers@ then someone > replies there and the reply goes to w...@? > > imho if we merge then don't keep separate dwm and wmii lists > > if there are too many commits then commit messages may be separated > from discussions
Well, let's have one list then as you propose and see how we get on. I like to see the commits side by side. Because so far there were nearly 0 discussions regarding commits, but we had plenty on dwm@ about patches. Still, the traffic won't go up like hell. Kind regards, Anselm
