Well, 7O1YGF was disallowed for DXCC because the license (or whatever) was
supposedly signed by the "wrong person". I'm not trying to start
something, but I figure if that technicality is enough to disallow credit,
this probably is too.
But several have mentioned something I'd not thought about. Let's assume
for a minute that FJ/OH2AM is disallowed for DXCC. WHERE ARE ALL THE FJ
HAMS RIGHT NOW? Yes, I'm shouting. Were it me, were I an FJ ham, I'd be
doing two things:
1. Not worrying much about FJ/OH2AM DXCC legality. I might be a little
cheesed they started first, but I wouldn't have let that situation develop
to begin with. I'd have been on the air on the first day FJ became an
entity. Even with FJ/OH2AM's presence I would have been on 10 (you never
know), 15, RTTY, 160, etc.
2. With FJ/OH2AM no longer operating, I'd be pounding away giving
everybody a new one. That's what bothers me right now. What is the
possible motivation to avoid being on the air? FJ5KH has already been on
the air, so it's not like this will be another "first time" operation.
By far, #2 bothers me the most. OK, feel free to question the "legality"
of the previous operation, but then don't keep your rigs cold. Get on the
air and have some fun. I'm confused.
73, Joe KQ3F
At 12:23 AM 12/29/2007 -0500, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
IF this is correct... if the club call was improperly used... is THIS enough
to cause the DXCC desk to disapprove of the operation for DXCC purposes?
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, [email protected]
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
