For the record, the LOW process involves issuance of electronic certificates for authenticity and encoding purposes. This is a massive task and even if the ARRL doesn't levy a per transaction charge, I'd expect a registration fee or at least a certificate replacement fee.
But someone in authority should feel free to respond that they've actually dealt with all of the technical issues and that LOW will be completely free to participants. 73 Mike WA0SXV -----Original Message----- From: Pete Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 06:36 To: wa0sxv ; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Next version of DX4WIN - tracking QSLs and e-QSLs? At 08:51 PM 11/19/02 -0600, Mike Mellinger WA0SXV wrote: >Exactly. Plus it is not clear what the charges are to participate. I'm >not confident of LOW's success. I can't speak to the technical success, but ARRL has been on the record for some years that LOW will be free to log submitters. They already charge for DXCC, don't they? 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower
