I'm speculating here... But since they REQUIRE the satellite name... Perhaps they have some custom logic to handle the specifics of each satellite... I guess we will find out as we upload data...
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Wilcox / NS1Z > Sent: October 21, 2003 06:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected]; 'Paul van der Eijk' > Subject: RE: [Dx4win] LOTW and SAT QSOs > > > Apparently the LoTW software authors were not real familiar > with satellite operations. On AO-40, as many of you may know, > you can QSO with a station using U/S while you are using L/S. > In this case the uplink and downlink bands will never match... > > I am not personally familiar with using X and K bands so I > have no pearls to offer on those bands. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Mel > Sent: > Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected]; 'Paul van der Eijk' > Subject: RE: [Dx4win] LOTW and SAT QSOs > > > From the AMSAT site: > > > Both the uplink and downlink bands of the two QSO records > (yours and the other station's) must match in order for LoTW > to connect the two into a "QSL" record. Also, LoTW infers the > satellite mode from the two band fields, and any future > mode-specific awards will take notice of that. > > > _______________________________________________ > Dx4win mailing list > [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win >
