I also like the idea of "S" instead of "M". Not only is
the "S" easier to see, but it better-covers other methods
of QSL'ing like "via the buro". Perhaps it could become
either letter, to cover both preferences. (:-))
73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 2 09:42:22 2004
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe - =?iso-8859-1?Q?WD=D8M?=)
Date: Tue Nov 2 09:45:02 2004
Subject: [Dx4win] Report Improvement Suggestion
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Great idea! I'll change my recommendation to "C"! :-)
73,
Joe
WD?M
At 03:49 AM 11/2/2004, Todd wrote:
>Well like I said, I agree fundamentally but to be honest I can see both
>just as well at this point of my life. I'm sure a day will come that I
>may change that tune. Just in case anyone's wondering I'm on a 19" screen
>at 1600 x 1200 (thought I was at 1024 x 768 still) because I wanted to
>have too much open on the screen at once, (like every window) and have
>done so since version 4.x .
>
>I suppose I could used to an "O" as well any other letter :O)
>
>WWMWMWM
>works too LOL!
>
>I think the only solution to this whole problem is to have this:
>
>CCCCCCCCCCC
>
>We all can see that one. Anyway, thanks for the bandwidth and I'm mostly
>just funnin' with everyone cuz' it don't much matter to me what letter is
>used and if the majority wants something other than "M" that's fine with
>me. I want all "C's" anyway :O)
>73,
>
>Todd
>WM8C's Ham Links
>www.wm8c.com
>All emails scanned with NIS2003
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe - WD?M
> To: Todd ; DX 4 Windows
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Report Improvement Suggestion
>
>
> Scolded? Naaahhhh.........mildly chastised? Maybe. I use a 19 inch LCD
> screen.....I see absolutely everything fine otherwise....why should I have
> to compromise with DX4WIN? The report isn't anything I can change. Why
> not focus (pardon the pun) on customer satisfaction, since it's something
> I'd think is quite easily changed. Maybe the COLOR could be changed in
> the
> report to emphasize the differences, rather than be limited to black on
> white? The significant confusion factor is the consistency of vertical
> and
> slanted lines seen (pun again) in using the M and W.
>
> Here's the example:
>
> MMWMMWW
> MMOMMOO
>
> Which is easier to distinguish?
>
> 73,
> Joe
> WD?M
> (ex WL7M, which is the same upside down!)
>
>
>
> At 03:54 PM 11/1/2004, Todd wrote:
> >Hmmm...sounds to me like larger screens or lower screen resolutions
> are in
> >order :O) I only need reading glasses at this point but and still 1024 x
> >768, but could always go back to 640 x 480 if I had too :O) I agree
> >fundamentally with the point being made but it sounds like the screens
> are
> >either too small or resolutions too high for the user. I know it's easy
> >to want to get everything on the screen, but maybe time to sacrifice
> >something so you don't have to strain so hard to see it? Just my
> thoughts
> >and I'm sure I'll get scolded for them...
> >73,
> >
> >Todd
> >WM8C
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dx4win mailing list
>Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
