Pete, You need to replace CONTEST_ID with COMMENT. That will put it in the Notes for this QSO field. If you want something to go into the Notes for this call field you would use NOTES.
73, Alan N5NA Pete Smith wrote: > I'm trying to import my N1MM log into DX4WIN 6.03, and am having > problems understanding how DX4WIN decides which ADIF fields to import > and where to put them. For example, when I import an unmodified ADIF > log, the import goes fine, but for every contest QSO the frequency to > several decimal places (FREQ, in ADIF) plus the transmitted serial > number (STX, in ADIF) are both put into the Notes for QSO field. > > What I would like to import into this field, in most cases, is the > name of the contest (CONTEST_ID). I couldn't care less about the > frequency or the STX (which in many cases, at least with MM, is not an > actual contest exchange serial number, but a mythical creature, in > contests that don't require one). > > I tried using a word processor to replace CONTEST_ID with STX, and > that worked, so far as importing the contest name, but it wound up > labeled with "SerNr=" in every QSO record. > > I have rummaged through the import file editor, as well as the help, > and have not been able to find anywhere that explains which ADIF tag > is mapped to which location in DX4WIN's record structure, or the > extent to which the mapping can be changed. Can anyone enlighten me? > > 73, Pete N4ZR > The World HF Contest Station Database > was updated 12 January 2005 > 2868 contest stations at > www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm > _______________________________________________ > Dx4win mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 14:09:07 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C) Date: Wed Mar 16 14:12:30 2005 Subject: [Dx4win] 6.04 annoying bug In-Reply-To: 6667 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Zoran Brlecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps I wasn't clear enough: one column, yes, but while before the > Conf column only displayed "Y" for confirmed and left blank entries for > non-confirmed, now it displays "N" for non-confirmed (instead of blank > fields), which makes it very difficult to differentiate at a glance. The > N's are a problem. Curiously enough, the Upl Cnf column displays > properly, i.e. "Y" for confirmed and blanks for non-confirmed. I understand this better now. At the very least, they should be consistent. Paul can probably fix this in the next version. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 16:51:36 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Tingler) Date: Wed Mar 16 16:55:07 2005 Subject: [Dx4win] Cabrillo Files Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I do not see Cabrillo as a choice on the file export menu so, does anyone know of a program I can use to create a Cabrillo file from DX4WIN log data? Thanks, David
