Thanks George, come valid points.

Courtney

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Harlem, W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jack'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:47 PM
Subject: RE: [DXBase] Feature requests for DXB-2004


> Courtney, you might want to reconsider this hasty statement.  DXBase is
> a great product.  We customers like it instead of the competition,
> that's why we chose it.  Part of the dues you have to pay for deciding
> to offer an email reflector is the occasional criticism of your
> product's deficiencies.  Fortunately, DXBase has fewer in general than
> the competition.  But if you wish to continue to upgrade, enhance and
> otherwise maintain your competitive edge, you have to listen to your
> customers.  I personally do not believe many of us are going to send you
> private messages with our suggested enhancements of your product in
> order to "protect" DXBase from the marketplace.  Countries that
> attempted to protect their domestic industries from competition through
> trade barriers learned that it's a futile practice.  Don't fear
> competition.  Let us, your loyal customers, assist you in maintaining
> your leadership position.
> 
> George W1EBI
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Jack
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:36 PM
> To: Tom; Peter Dougherty; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DXBase] Feature requests for DXB-2004
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We appreciate input, but a couple requests.  Please don't post them to
> the
> reflector.  We already have competitors who wait till we offer an
> upgrade,
> then they go scan our web to see the new stuff and then they come out
> with
> their upgrades many months later and wouldn't you know it, their list of
> new
> features looks remarkably similar to what we already offered plus their
> usual list of bug fixes.  We don't need to present a roadmap here to the
> world.  Send us your requests in direct email and include plenty of
> detail
> on exactly what you mean.  Thanks for your consideration.  Also, please
> note
> that traditionally, our release cycle is such that whatever is planned
> for
> the next upgrade has already been established and chances are that we
> are
> already in a beta test cycle for the "next" release.  Asking for things
> in
> the "next" release at this time of year is not likely to happen unless
> you
> just happen to mention something that has already been submitted
> previously
> by someone else.  We take all requests throughout the year and store
> them in
> our files and at some point we review them, prioritize them, and
> determine
> how much can be accomplished in the amount of time available for
> development.  Usually that all happens around the early fall.
> 
> Regards,
> Courtney
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Peter Dougherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [DXBase] Feature requests for DXB-2004
> 
> 
> > Hi Jack:
> >
> > Here is my brief list of my recommendations for DXbase 2004:
> >
> > 1.Isn't there some small backup routine that you could include in the
> next
> update of DXbase that
> >  would make backup an automatic feature upon shut down of DXbase.
> Currently you save all the
> > tables
> >  at shutdown of DXbase. Why not just perform a backup automatically at
> that time and let the user
> >  specify the backup medium (eg 2nd hard drive or CD-ROM)?
> >
> > 2. Please consider displaying the local time of the DX station. It's a
> >    little thing but really important when working a station across the
> globe.
> >
> > 3. Draggable colums i.e. an easy way to re-arrange the column order.
> If
> >    this can't be done, at least make it possible to EDIT a column
> >    configuration file (rather than generating it from scratch every
> time).
> >
> > Tnx for a great program. Let's try to make it even better.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tom, N0YD "Yankee Doodle"
> >
> >
> >
> ************************************************************************
> ****
> *************
> >
> > --- Peter Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to offer a wish list of features or changes for DXB-2004,
> if
> it's
> > > not already too late. While I love 2003, there are still a few
> things
> that
> > > drive me batty, and a few neat features that I've played with in
> other
> > > loggers that I'd love to see implemented here if possible.
> > >
> > > 1. Easier method of saving the database (no batch files, etc), and
> also
> of
> > > importing and exporting from/to other apps.
> > >
> > > 2. When exporting data, allow USB and LSB contacts to be either
> exported
> as
> > > such or as the more generic SSB (I also use a compact logger on my
> laptop
> > > called AA Log that does not recognize LSB/USB properly). Having the
> choice
> > > of either format would be great.
> > >
> > > 3. Allow the notes field to be exported to ADIF without extra
> comments
> > > (specifically, I don't need OPR-CALL added to every exported QSO
> since
> I'm
> > > the only one using the log!
> > >
> > > 4. Band Mapping. I fell in love with this feature in N1MM and
> CommCat,
> and
> > > if there's EVER a possibility of implementing this in DX Base,
> please
> > > *please* find a way of doing this (again, optional for those who
> might
> wish
> > > to use it).
> > >
> > > 5. Pet Peeve...There are now two boxes with the title Previous QSO.
> One
> is
> > > View\Previous QSO that works beautifully. The other...well, I don't
> know
> > > how to turn this on and off...I just leave it on. It's the one that
> gets
> > > populated as a spot comes in to let me know if I've ever worked the
> station
> > > before, etc. This box cannot be minimized, can only be closed, and
> always
> > > sits on top of everything else. This behaviour is incredibly
> annoying.
> > > Could you PLEASE change this in DXB-2004?
> > >
> > > 6. On the same topic, how about allowing the VHF packet window to be
> closed
> > > and stay closed?! I don't ever use it, and with T1-speed in my home,
> I
> > > never will. Period. I have it minimized now, but why should I have
> to
> have
> > > it open at all? I really want every window available to be fully
> > > customizable and placeable wherever I want.
> > >
> > > 7. If I choose to not use VHF packet, how about allowing things like
> CTL-P
> > > for printing, CTRL+S for saving, etc...i.e. Windows shortcuts that
> work
> in
> > > every other standardized Windows app out there.
> > >
> > > 8. Please consider displaying the local time of the DX station. It's
> a
> > > little thing but really important when working a station across the
> globe.
> > >
> > > 9. I can presently remove all raw spots, all filtered spots but NOT
> > > messages from the cluster monitor. Can a right-menu item to clear
> all
> > > messages be displayed, or maybe a setting to expire them after x
> hours.
> > >
> > > 10. IOTA Handling. I brought this one up a few months ago, and I'd
> dearly
> > > love to see it implemented  in an upcoming version. In short, there
> are
> > > numerous DXCC entities that are self-contained IOTA entities as well
> (to
> > > wit, mainland Australia (VK1-8) is OC001, KH3 always maps to OC023,
> VP9
> > > always maps to NA005, etc). While some entities have multiple IOTAs
> (and
> > > can be left blank), why not automatically populate the IOTA field
> just
> as
> > > you do the prefix field for those that have a one-to-one mapping?
> This
> > > sounds easy enough to implement...
> > >
> > > 11. Draggable colums i.e. an easy way to re-arrange the column
> order. If
> > > this can't be done, at least make it possible to EDIT a column
> > > configuration file (rather than generating it from scratch every
> time).
> > >
> > > 12. This one might take some heavy-lifting. Most other loggers use a
> > > separate "form" to enter a new QSO into the log. When I first
> started
> using
> > > DXBase 2 years ago, I actively disliked using the bottom-most line
> of
> the
> > > log as the entry point. I think a customizable QSO entry form window
> would
> > > be a tremendous addition to the program. For those who don't like
> this
> > > method (and prefer to stay the way it is now), how about letting the
> end
> > > user decide and make its use optional?
> > >
> > > Thanks for an absolutely amazing program, and I hope some of all of
> these
> > > changes might be do-able.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 73 de Peter (W2IRT)
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Please visit http://www.nyctrackbook.com for details of my book
> > > Tracks of the NYC Subway
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> 
> 

Reply via email to