Tom and George, No problem -- let's see what we can do - I'll keep you all in touch with how things are going and if/when I am ready, I'll have it available for all 2005 users..
Tom - the reason for removal of the small band/mode summary, was that it slowed down the report badly - so we just removed it. That's the only problem when it comes to "number-crunching". the Crystal Report programs begin to slow down severely.. So, for the sake of timeliness - we got rid of that -- it seems just like yesterday - but that was back in Sept 2004 that we made the K2TA version of the report! How time flies!! LOL! More later.. Joe wa6axe Tom Althoff wrote: > I'll second George's request Joe....if it's not too much trouble. > > Historically...my first DOS program that printed the report from DXBase 2.0 > only had 160-10. When I added WARC bands later...it was easiest to tag them > on the the end. Just programming laziness on my part more than any > "logical" choice. > > I sent a copy of my old report to Joe and asked if he could duplicate it. > Looking back we probably should have discussed the re-sequencing of the > bands report. > > BTW...the original report was printed double sided on a single sheet of > paper and laminated. It also printed the country totals for each band/mode > in bottom right hand corner of the 2nd side. That little band/mode summary > did not get duplicated in the DXBase 2005 version. Not sure why...I don't > think we discussed it. > > Joe...sorry to give you more work. But thank you again if you can do it. > > 73 de Tom K2TA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Harlem W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:29 PM > Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report > > > >>Joe, is there any way to revise the K2TA report to show the band columns >>in ascending sequence, i.e. from 160m to 10m, as in the DXCC Award >>Credits Listing from ARRL? I'm trying to resolve a few differences >>between my log and DXCC and it's really time consuming comparing the two >>almost-similar reports--the K2TA columns now read >>"160-80-40-20-10-30-17-12". I guess I know why, but how hard would it >>be to change? >> >>George W1EBI >> >>______________________________________________________________ >>Dxbase mailing list >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 20:30:19 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Glockner) Date: Mon Mar 21 20:34:47 2005 Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom and all: I was looking back thru my emails with you - back in the Sept 2004 timeframe -- I mentioned about the already made report called hfnumericstats.rpt (full-blown report for stats) -- and we opted for that one (stats-wise) - vice trying to make a small summary on your report ... NO problem -- I have already modified the K2TA report and am right now modifying the Options version of that report too ... So -- if anyone wants the 160-10 and options version 160-6 meters -- with the bands in logical sequence -- just send me an email and the reports (with new Rptdesc.ini entries) will be coming in a zip file ... FYI -- I opted to name these new versions "a different filename" -- so that if the person wanted to KEEP the original too - they could... 73 Joe wa6axe Tom Althoff wrote: > I'll second George's request Joe....if it's not too much trouble. > > Historically...my first DOS program that printed the report from DXBase 2.0 > only had 160-10. When I added WARC bands later...it was easiest to tag them > on the the end. Just programming laziness on my part more than any > "logical" choice. > > I sent a copy of my old report to Joe and asked if he could duplicate it. > Looking back we probably should have discussed the re-sequencing of the > bands report. > > BTW...the original report was printed double sided on a single sheet of > paper and laminated. It also printed the country totals for each band/mode > in bottom right hand corner of the 2nd side. That little band/mode summary > did not get duplicated in the DXBase 2005 version. Not sure why...I don't > think we discussed it. > > Joe...sorry to give you more work. But thank you again if you can do it. > > 73 de Tom K2TA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Harlem W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:29 PM > Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report > > > >>Joe, is there any way to revise the K2TA report to show the band columns >>in ascending sequence, i.e. from 160m to 10m, as in the DXCC Award >>Credits Listing from ARRL? I'm trying to resolve a few differences >>between my log and DXCC and it's really time consuming comparing the two >>almost-similar reports--the K2TA columns now read >>"160-80-40-20-10-30-17-12". I guess I know why, but how hard would it >>be to change? >> >>George W1EBI >> >>______________________________________________________________ >>Dxbase mailing list >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 20:50:52 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Glockner) Date: Mon Mar 21 20:55:04 2005 Subject: [Dxbase] NEW versions of the K2TA and Options DXCC checklist are now available Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To all: I have already sent Tom and George - their new versions of both the K2TA and also the Options DXCC Checklist.. The ZIP file is available (by email from myself) to any DXbase2005 user who would like it.. just reply to this email. Tnx! 73 Joe wa6axe From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 16:46:02 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Harlem W1EBI) Date: Tue Mar 22 16:50:27 2005 Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> How about that for customer service? Make a request and get a new report all inside 12 hours...overnight! Does DXbase have the best general logging program support team, or what? Thanks, Joe! George W1EBI ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Joseph Glockner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tom Althoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:30:19 -0600 Subject: Re: [Dxbase] K2TA report > Tom and all: > > I was looking back thru my emails with you - back in the > Sept 2004 timeframe -- I mentioned about the already made > report called hfnumericstats.rpt (full-blown report for > stats) -- and we opted for that one (stats-wise) - vice > trying to make a small summary on your report ... > > NO problem -- I have already modified the K2TA report and > am right now modifying the Options version of that report > too ... > > So -- if anyone wants the 160-10 and options version 160-6 > meters -- with the bands in logical sequence -- just send me > an email and the reports (with new Rptdesc.ini entries) will > be coming in a zip file ... > > FYI -- I opted to name these new versions "a different filename" > -- so that if the person wanted to KEEP the original too - they > could... > > 73 Joe wa6axe > > Tom Althoff wrote: > > > I'll second George's request Joe....if it's not too much trouble. > > > > Historically...my first DOS program that printed the report from DXBase 2.0 > > only had 160-10. When I added WARC bands later...it was easiest to tag them > > on the the end. Just programming laziness on my part more than any > > "logical" choice. > > > > I sent a copy of my old report to Joe and asked if he could duplicate it. > > Looking back we probably should have discussed the re-sequencing of the > > bands report. > > > > BTW...the original report was printed double sided on a single sheet of > > paper and laminated. It also printed the country totals for each band/mode > > in bottom right hand corner of the 2nd side. That little band/mode summary > > did not get duplicated in the DXBase 2005 version. Not sure why...I don't > > think we discussed it. > > > > Joe...sorry to give you more work. But thank you again if you can do it. > > > > 73 de Tom K2TA > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "George Harlem W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:29 PM > > Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report > > > > > > > >>Joe, is there any way to revise the K2TA report to show the band columns > >>in ascending sequence, i.e. from 160m to 10m, as in the DXCC Award > >>Credits Listing from ARRL? I'm trying to resolve a few differences > >>between my log and DXCC and it's really time consuming comparing the two > >>almost-similar reports--the K2TA columns now read > >>"160-80-40-20-10-30-17-12". I guess I know why, but how hard would it > >>be to change? > >> > >>George W1EBI > >> > >>______________________________________________________________ > >>Dxbase mailing list > >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >>Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Dxbase mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] ------- End of Original Message -------
