Certainly the best....and the most underpaid! 8-)

Thanks Joe!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Harlem W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joseph Glockner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Althoff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Dxbase] K2TA report


> How about that for customer service?  Make a request and get a new report
all
> inside 12 hours...overnight!  Does DXbase have the best general logging
> program support team, or what?
>
> Thanks, Joe!
>
> George W1EBI
>
>
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Joseph Glockner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tom Althoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:30:19 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] K2TA report
>
> > Tom and all:
> >
> > I was looking back thru my emails with you - back in the
> > Sept 2004 timeframe -- I mentioned about the already made
> > report called hfnumericstats.rpt (full-blown report for
> > stats) -- and we opted for that one (stats-wise) - vice
> > trying to make a small summary on your report ...
> >
> > NO problem -- I have already modified the K2TA report and
> > am right now modifying the Options version of that report
> > too ...
> >
> > So -- if anyone wants the 160-10  and options version 160-6
> > meters -- with the bands in logical sequence -- just send me
> > an email and the reports (with new Rptdesc.ini entries) will
> > be coming in a zip file ...
> >
> > FYI -- I opted to name these new versions "a different filename"
> > -- so that if the person wanted to KEEP the original too - they
> > could...
> >
> > 73 Joe wa6axe
> >
> > Tom Althoff wrote:
> >
> > > I'll second George's request Joe....if it's not too much trouble.
> > >
> > > Historically...my first DOS program that printed the report from
DXBase
> 2.0
> > > only had 160-10.  When I added WARC bands later...it was easiest to
tag
> them
> > > on the the end.   Just programming laziness on my part more than any
> > > "logical" choice.
> > >
> > > I sent a copy of my old report to Joe and asked if he could duplicate
it.
> > > Looking back we probably should have discussed the re-sequencing of
the
> > > bands report.
> > >
> > > BTW...the original report was printed double sided on a single sheet
of
> > > paper and laminated.  It also printed the country totals for each
> band/mode
> > > in bottom right hand corner of the 2nd side.  That little band/mode
> summary
> > > did not get duplicated in the DXBase 2005 version.   Not sure why...I
> don't
> > > think we discussed it.
> > >
> > > Joe...sorry to give you more work.  But thank you again if you can do
it.
> > >
> > > 73 de Tom K2TA
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "George Harlem W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:29 PM
> > > Subject: [Dxbase] K2TA report
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Joe, is there any way to revise the K2TA report to show the band
columns
> > >>in ascending sequence, i.e. from 160m to 10m, as in the DXCC Award
> > >>Credits Listing from ARRL?  I'm trying to resolve a few differences
> > >>between my log and DXCC and it's really time consuming comparing the
two
> > >>almost-similar reports--the K2TA columns now read
> > >>"160-80-40-20-10-30-17-12".  I guess I know why, but how hard would it
> > >>be to change?
> > >>
> > >>George W1EBI
> > >>
> > >>______________________________________________________________
> > >>Dxbase mailing list
> > >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> > >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > >>Post: mailto:[email protected]
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > Dxbase mailing list
> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > Post: mailto:[email protected]
> > >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Dxbase mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:[email protected]
> ------- End of Original Message -------
>

Reply via email to