And I totally agree Bill. I think Jack has better things to do than waste his and our time.
At 11:45 AM 3/12/2006, FireBrick wrote: >AS eQSL has refused to install security measures that ARRL requested. >As eQSL is not acceptable for any award other than eQSL. >As eQSL has been proven to be 'jobbed' > >I think it would be a massive waste of coding time. > >To me, eQSL is like a bank that you put money into, but don't even >get a working toaster, no interest, and it's not insured. > > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Cassel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:24 AM >Subject: [Dxbase] eQSL > > >> >>Hello fellow DXbase users >> >>While I do not print cards generated from within eQSL, I do support the >>project (www.eqsl.org) and as such am uploading log files every few weeks. >>There are 10s of thousands of hams worldwide who use eQSL which in my mind >>is the wave of the future. Yes LoTW sounded like a good idea at the time >>but it in my personal opinion has proven to be a colossal failure plus is >>does nothing to support QSL exchanges. >> >>Now for us DXB users it requires ..... finding when we last uploaded - use >>the selection wizard to grab and create an ADIF file - upload this file to >>eQSL. >> >>QUESTION >>Many logging programs are now creating automatic upload modules to allow >>real-time updating of the users eQSL database. Why not DXbase? >>http://eqsl.cc/qslcard/ADIFLoggerInfo.cfm >> >>Paul VE3SY >> >>______________________________________________________________ >>Dxbase mailing list >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>Post: mailto:[email protected] > > >______________________________________________________________ >Dxbase mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[email protected]
