There already are some columns you could use right now - one is the
User1 or User2  (Checkmark) -- or -- Special1 or Special2 (Narrative
fill-in) .. and, all of the above are already "in" the selection wizard.

73,

Joe WA6AXE

Ron Stordahl wrote:

> QSLing is a chore and at times quite frustrating.  Among the most 
> annoying things is trying to get those rare ones who you have to QSL a 
> second time (or maybe a third).  In some cases it's just not worth 
> another try, but making this determination is difficult.
> 
> Once or twice a year I run a list of all my needed QSL's and try to 
> determine what should be done with some of the difficult but often much 
> needed ones.
> 
> I would like to see a flag I could set on the QSO record that would say 
> in effect "SUSPENDED".  This would mean it's not worth trying anymore, 
> yet I don't want to either delete the Q or mark it as not valid for 
> DXCC.  The reason is that a miracle might happen and and card comes in, 
> either as a real card or via LoTW.  It has happened that such a card has 
> shown up, and if I had deleted the Q I would have to re-enter it.  If 
> such a confirmation does come in, then when making it confirmed, I would 
> like the "SUSPENDED" status to be removed automatically.
> 
> When using the Tools>Selection Wizard I would like to be able to choose 
> to include or exclude suspended Q's from the selection wizard output.  
> Also in the Summary window if for example I have worked 5T on 10 Phone 
> but it's suspended then instead of a black W, perhaps a red W could 
> instead be shown.
> 
> The feature of a SUSPENDED status would reduce the work load on QSLing 
> by not presenting me again and again the same Q to sutdy which I have 
> decided before is not work working on again, yet I am not ready to 
> delete it from the log.
> 
> While my suggestion is for a new status flag, if someone has a 
> suggestion of another way to deal with this I am listening!
> 
> Ron, N5IN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dxbase mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> 
> 
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jan  9 17:24:32 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joe barkley)
Date: Tue Jan  9 17:30:49 2007
Subject: [Dxbase] Printing single QSL labels
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Has anyone figured any way to print single QSL labels with DXB 2007
like on a DYMO printer. I use the DYMO for address labels and
have not ever found a way to get the QSL info out for a single
label print. I hate to waste the label sheets when I just need a few 
labels done.
Thanks for any help,
73
Joe KI4TZ
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jan  9 17:50:23 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Stordahl)
Date: Tue Jan  9 17:56:31 2007
Subject: [Dxbase] QSLing enhancement for DXB2008.....
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I had considered those Joe, but they work just the opposite of what I 
need.  I need to be able to set a flag which will cause the flagged 
record to be excluded from wizard output.  Those flags will cause the 
record to be included (and exclude anything which is not flagged). 

The idea is that the usual case would be where I wanted wizard output 
excluding these Q's, because I am tired of re-examining these particular 
Q's periodically.  Yet I don't want to delete these Q's.  And if a card 
or LoTW does come in from my past efforts I would like the Q to be 
automatically be removed from the 'suspended' state.

Ron, N5IN

Joseph Glockner wrote:
> There already are some columns you could use right now - one is the
> User1 or User2  (Checkmark) -- or -- Special1 or Special2 (Narrative
> fill-in) .. and, all of the above are already "in" the selection wizard.
>
> 73,
>
> Joe WA6AXE
>
> Ron Stordahl wrote:
>
>> QSLing is a chore and at times quite frustrating.  Among the most 
>> annoying things is trying to get those rare ones who you have to QSL 
>> a second time (or maybe a third).  In some cases it's just not worth 
>> another try, but making this determination is difficult.
>>
>> Once or twice a year I run a list of all my needed QSL's and try to 
>> determine what should be done with some of the difficult but often 
>> much needed ones.
>>
>> I would like to see a flag I could set on the QSO record that would 
>> say in effect "SUSPENDED".  This would mean it's not worth trying 
>> anymore, yet I don't want to either delete the Q or mark it as not 
>> valid for DXCC.  The reason is that a miracle might happen and and 
>> card comes in, either as a real card or via LoTW.  It has happened 
>> that such a card has shown up, and if I had deleted the Q I would 
>> have to re-enter it.  If such a confirmation does come in, then when 
>> making it confirmed, I would like the "SUSPENDED" status to be 
>> removed automatically.
>>
>> When using the Tools>Selection Wizard I would like to be able to 
>> choose to include or exclude suspended Q's from the selection wizard 
>> output.  Also in the Summary window if for example I have worked 5T 
>> on 10 Phone but it's suspended then instead of a black W, perhaps a 
>> red W could instead be shown.
>>
>> The feature of a SUSPENDED status would reduce the work load on 
>> QSLing by not presenting me again and again the same Q to sutdy which 
>> I have decided before is not work working on again, yet I am not 
>> ready to delete it from the log.
>>
>> While my suggestion is for a new status flag, if someone has a 
>> suggestion of another way to deal with this I am listening!
>>
>> Ron, N5IN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Dxbase mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Jan 12 19:10:47 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dr. Michael Hunter)
Date: Fri Jan 12 19:11:32 2007
Subject: [Dxbase] DXBase & MicroHam
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Just hooked up the new Microham last week and worked fine in the RU RTTY
Test. Noticed when I have DXbase working, that the freq does not show or the
band. When I click on the DX station coming through on the internet, the
freq will not change. When I use Writelog, the freq will be noted. So, I
click on the Microham router first and the freq is listed on the port tab.
Then I start DxBase and the freq is not noted. The Com ports are the same
which is Com 3.

 

So any suggestion as to what is missing in DxBase ?

 

Mike

Reply via email to