TO all: I am sending an email for Oystein to the reflector. Pse respond back to him directly.
Here is his email: We need support for FT-9000. I seem to remember some on this forum about FT-9000. Any that have a Radios.ini containing FT-9000 definitions? Thanks. 73 de ?ystein Stokkeland LA7QI From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 8 20:48:30 2008 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Glockner) Date: Fri Feb 8 20:52:56 2008 Subject: [Dxbase] Cabrillo file signed and uploaded to the ARRL LoTW website - anyone doing this? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To all: Has anyone ever "signed" a Cabrillo formatted file for uploading to the ARRL Lotw website - and truely uploaded that to the LoTW server? Reason I ask is that if you were running a CONTEST program (like N1MM or Writelog, etc) in a SSB/PHONE contest and you outputted a CABRILLO formatted file from that Contesting s/w program -- and you "signed" THAT Cabrillo file with TQSL and uploaded that *.tq8 file to the ARRL LoTW website -- the MODE "will" be listed as PHONE on the LoTW QSO record -- and, of course, you would ALSO do an ADIF Import into DXbase of those contest QSOs using the Non-DXB Import utility.. THEN, when you get ready to download your LoTW QSOs that were confirmed on LoTW -- that MODE of PHONE will still be there -- BUT ---- when you do a Non-DXB Import into DXbase, you will generate a DUPE record/qso since the MODE of PHONE is not a VALID ADIF formatted MODE. We have found this happened to one DXbase user -- and, I have modified the REPORT I made that checks for 160meter QSOs with USB as the mode -- to include a CHECK for the SubMode of PHONE. This new version of the report is available straight from me - upon request. The BIG question here simply is -- has anyone EVER uploaded a Cabrillo file "signed" by TQSL - to the ARRL LoTW website ... If you have ever done this - pse send me an email. 73 Joe wa6axe
