|
I've been filtering thru and printing all
non-duplicate threads so I can break down the input from all effectively.
I will probably produce a rough dicussion-brief divided into two key
areas with subsections:
1) DynAPI issues still requiring
focus.
2) DynAPI3alpha discussion brief which will include
everyones inputs on "anything" topically related to the next-gen of this
API.
I will most likely distill the first draft as a PDF
file that I hope stays under the 40K limit, but eventually we are gonna need a
more colaborative environment probably located at the DynAPI homepage.
Thoughts on web-based colaboration tool options would be appreciated.
Might actually be something right here at Source Forge.
This tool should allow for draft inputs and
notations to a more text based document with supplemental drawings and
diagrams (knew I had a special purpose here), I don't think the standard CVS
will serve in that roll.
Additionally, I think all thoses who would like to
actively "be involved" in this "Planning Stage" should raise their hands now and
express an interest, or throw a rock. I recommend we develop a
"start-team" of those interested to at least get us through the planning stages
and to a presentable draft that can then be shared with everyone in
a open forum.
All of the above is of course subject to
administrative change, I am just trying to create a better environment for an
open-source team effort and I truely think having a "plan" is the best first
step here.
|
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha Raymond Smith
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha francesco AGATI
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha Doug Melvin
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha Pascal Bestebroer
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral
- Re[2]: [Dynapi-Dev] API3,alpha Robert Rainwater
