the addChild() is the first point that creates an actual HTML element/object
(it adds contents to the html page)
this would suggest that normal javascript objects are freed (also sounds
logicall, seeing the documents found by Mr.Design) using some form of
garbage collection.
There might be a problem with javascript objects having a reference to real
html objects (layers) and that reference is still valid (so the GC won't
destroy the objects)..
Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software ontwikkelaar
Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
http://www.oibv.com
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Lasse Lindgård
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 februari 2001 13:47
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [Dynapi-Dev] Hunting the memoryhole with a shutgun
>
>
> After several attempts I still can't produce a simple example
> where IE5.5
> leaks without having DynAPI involved.
> The create example leaks 200kb.
> If you remove the DynAPI.document.addChild(myLayer) the leak stops.
> I wonder what that could be ?
> /Lasse
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev