Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Hunting the memoryhole with a shutgun

[Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral]

I agree.

Pascal wrote:

> the addChild() is the first point that creates an actual HTML element/object
> (it adds contents to the html page)
>
> this would suggest that normal javascript objects are freed (also sounds
> logicall, seeing the documents found by Mr.Design) using some form of
> garbage collection.
>
> There might be a problem with javascript objects having a reference to real
> html objects (layers) and that reference is still valid (so the GC won't
> destroy the objects)..
>
> Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Software ontwikkelaar
> Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
> http://www.oibv.com
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Lasse Lindgård
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 februari 2001 13:47
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: [Dynapi-Dev] Hunting the memoryhole with a shutgun
> >
> >
> > After several attempts I still can't produce a simple example
> > where IE5.5
> > leaks without having DynAPI involved.
> > The create example leaks 200kb.
> > If you remove the DynAPI.document.addChild(myLayer) the leak stops.
> > I wonder what that could be ?
> > /Lasse
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev


_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev