A few ideas that distilled from your response:
* Yes, it's nice to see Henrik and Cameron (and Robert of course) putting
some effort into the
website.
If anyone has time, would it be possible to make a kind of new-comer
introduction page, with all the relevant info grouped into a short faq.
there could be explained how to submit patches/bugs etc.
All this info is available in the normal faq/source-forge faq etc, but it's
amid so many other things it's not clear what is in use and what not.
* would it be hard to link to patches and buglists directly from the new
homepage?
* Do the patch posts also post to the list automatically?
* Could we keep a list of who volunteered for what (i.e. Henrik and Cameron
for the
website, Nuno for testing etc) and their email-addresses so we know who is
coordinating what.
* What happened to the Mac debuggers?


---- Original Message -----
From: "Pascal Bestebroer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] KeyEvents working in NS6


> > This raises an interesting issue though.  If bugs are meant to be
reported
> to the site and patches are also meant to be posted there, who is in
charge
> of keeping it up to date.  I see that there are some bugs listed there
that
> are obviously fixed (PathAnimation.run() bug for eg.).
>
> the bug/patch stuff is updated by the admins now and then (remember the
> freetime issues :)
> if things are posted to this mailinglist in moste cases it will get lost,
> because we're not going thru all
> the mails to see if we still need to fix a certain thing.  We only browse
> the patches/bug lists now and then.. and that's it.
>
> > I'm not saying that having it on the site is a bad thing.  I just find
> that the site is often behind the latest code and still lists bugs that
> don't exist anymore.
>
> That's just how it works with these projects, remember that there are only
3
> guys doing the major work here.. (that is development, faq's, tuts,
> documentation, CVS maintaining, bug/patches) luckily Henrik and Cameron
are
> now doing the website mostly, so that's one thing less.
>
> --------------------
> now in reply to richard's mail (just got in :) :
>
> > It might help if we actually use the functions like assigned to,
priority,
> etc that are available at source-forge.
> > Then we would at least know if someone had taken it on themselves to
look
> into the bug, and that it was not being forgotten.
>
> Read the above, there are only 3 active developers at this point (not
> counting all those bug submissions into this list, cause we are still the
> ones having to implement them and test them)  I would be happy to assign
> bugs to anyone else, but I don't think Jordi and Richard would like it :)
> Developers should assign them to them selves, but that's something that's
> not being done (there are about 13 names on the developers list !!
guys!?)
> No bugs are being forggoten, but a lot of bugs currently at sourceforge
are
>
> 1. Mac related.. nuff said
> 2. Include huge examples that are usually causing the problems, not the
> dynapi code. I requested this a few times to please keep your bug report
as
> short as possible (this means leaving out all the redundant code). Once
> that's done the code usually works, because all other non-dynapi code was
> removed.. I for one get very cranky having to debug other peoples code and
> finding out that that code is causing the bug, not the dynapi.
>
>
> and the patch area contains one patch..
>
> > Also, I've seen so many fixes for all kinds of things pass through the
> list without any comment, couldn't we have somewhere to > submit bugFIXES,
> where they would be acknowledged, and kept for reference, until they are
> tested and committed to CVS. Otherwise people are going to stop posting
> their bugfixes, because it seems the rest just don't care.
>
> that IS the patch area.. that's how we can look at fixes, and try and test
> them out.. no need for another area to do that.. We have also requested
many
> times to NOT post bug fixes/patches/whatever to this list, we are just not
> able to walk thru all these emails to see for bug fixes, that's what
> Sourceforge is for, if people would simply take the time to visit
> sourceforge, goto the patch/bug area, and add your patch/bug..
>
> again, I'm the one speaking out on this one, something I don't like, but
> sadly one of us has to do it..  so sorry for kicking people again
> (especially you two), but in my personal opinion (not sure about the
others)
> people complain to much without really helping out. And 3 guys, working in
> sparetime/freetime, can't do all the work that hundreds are
> requesting/using, simple.
>
> ...
>
>
> Pascal Bestebroer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dynamic-core.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>



_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev

Reply via email to