> Why don't you pull in more people to do the major work? As in people
> doing documentation, coding, etc. I'm sure there are people
> on the list
> who'd volunteer for that.

the developers list at sourceforge contains more then 3 names, but most of
them are not working on the DynAPI directly.. It seems to many people a
problem comitting to a project like this for a longer period of time. I know
this is happening to many other opensource projects, where only a few people
are doing the actuall work..   I know people need time to get to grasp with
all this code (and now we changed everything completely :) but not doing any
bug fix at all in months, just doesn't seem very active to me.

Nobody likes doing documentation, nobody likes doing the debugging, I know
my last few mails seem bitter, I'm not, honest, but everytime I read these
emails from people:  "we should add this" or "we should start focusing on
that"  I keep wondering, who the WE part is refering to exactly.

I know there are persons out there being active as well (Doug for one) but
(warning: tricky comment coming up, so please take some coffee first) they
are not working directly on the code.. they are giving ideas, comments,
suggestions. Which is great, but doesn't get the "job" done.

Before people start replying, sorry again for me sounding
bitter/hard/ignorant/annoying/repeating/not-very-nice about this.. if you
want a more cheerfull look at it, read Jordi's messages, he doesn't get as
carried away as me :)

I just seem to have a habit of dealing with this more directly towards
persons, might be good, might be bad, it's just the way it is, somepeople
never change.. (someone should wright a song about that :)

(hmm.. maybe this is the reason that whole rock methaphor was brought into
life)

Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software ontwikkelaar
Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
http://www.oibv.com



_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev

Reply via email to