We don't need an advance build system.
We only need proper coding technique.
We've had this disscussion before and the fact remains that:
a) semicolons and {}'s make the code more understandable (ugly or not)
b) every time someone decides to make a tool for DynAPI it:
1) doesn't get finished
2) that person is not contributing to DynAPI while their attention is
focused elsewhere.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephan Tolksdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: Re[4]: [Dynapi-Dev] Pondering the "API"...
> >semicolos and []'s are why jspack never really worked with DynAPI.
>
> That wasn't my question.
>
> > AS for building anew tool.. why? there are a dozen or so out there
anyways?
> > How can spending our time building something other than DynAPI be a
better
> > invetsment of time?
>
> So you want to make your source (your project) "worse" just because an
> other software isn't good enough, just to be able to use a tool that
> is too primitive to fit your needs.
> That's why I think the time would be better invested into an advanced
> build system.
>
> Stephan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
