----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Dynapi-Dev] Pondering the "API"...
> We don't need an advance build system.
> We only need proper coding technique.
> We've had this disscussion before and the fact remains that:
> a) semicolons and {}'s make the code more understandable (ugly or not)
> b) every time someone decides to make a tool for DynAPI it:
> 1) doesn't get finished
> 2) that person is not contributing to DynAPI while their attention is
> focused elsewhere.
As far as I'm concerned it's not a one-.man job. And its up to the person, don't you
think. BTW isn't the tool itself a contribution if we can finish it?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephan Tolksdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re[4]: [Dynapi-Dev] Pondering the "API"...
>
>
> >
> > > AS for building anew tool.. why? there are a dozen or so out there
> anyways?
> > > How can spending our time building something other than DynAPI be a
> better
> > > invetsment of time?
> >
> > So you want to make your source (your project) "worse" just because an
> > other software isn't good enough, just to be able to use a tool that
> > is too primitive to fit your needs.
> > That's why I think the time would be better invested into an advanced
> > build system.
> >
> > Stephan
> >
> >
The thought is actually to help people to learn coding JS and with the DynAPI so hat
we get even more people using and developing the API as why the intention is a WYSIWYG
IDE with code view too.
Henrik V�glin [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
