hmm..did my best on the flaming..bit rusty I guess..
also, that whole bosses,clients,marketing,blah,blah stuff that keeps coming
up from users, is not important in this case.. because again, DynAPI2 was a
freetime project for most of us.. and then it's a logicall step to go to the
next big thing: DOM only, expanding DHTML in more ways without the tinkering
with browser-compatibility.. doing more stuff easier and having fun with it
(freetime)..not having to care about clients and such (my site isn't event
accessable for ie4,ns4 users..)
> I think the reason not many people contribute to the API is
> because it is already built and done. All it needs are tweaks OR new
> radical ideas (why don't we split it DOM and non DOM).
if it's already built and done, why this flaming on someone starting a new
project ? :) not even going into splitting, because I'd rather refer to the
size(bloated)-factor...easier.
> The way I want DynAPI to develop is people writing more and
> more widgets,routines, classes to make actual application development
easier.
"the only way to achieve things in opensource is by doing it yourself"
not sure if someone ever said that, but it looks like a solid rule.
final note, look at it like this, Robert, me, and others are pushing DOM
standards, eventually making website designers (dynapi2 users, et al)
capable of using standard javascript code to do their designs.. so we're
basically still doing the same thing: making DHTML easier for others :)
(uhm, might have to read that multiple times before you believe me ;)
I know.. not really flaming.. damn, lost my touch I think.
Pascal Bestebroer
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
