> I'm sorry Stephan, but you are wrong. > Dynapi is not very optimized when it comes to creating layers. At all. > I have an API which will be part of a cross-browser framework, which already > is lightyears faster and more robust then DynAPI. Not to belittle DynAPI, as
As some now, I have developed my own highly optimized Api in the last summer too (it will be opened too the public in the next week or so). I haven't made much tests, but what makes Dynapi a bit sedate is its architecture (precreate, excessive use of events...). The layer creation code itself isn't the problem. Concerning speed differences, I think we talk of maybe up to 50% when comparing the different apis (creation of layers), that aren't the magnitudes which would legitimate a library rewrite ;-) Stephan _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
