I'm so glad to hear this. I have never used a DynImage, except to try it out in a few examples, and it's the cause of several bugs at the moment.
Not that we should delete it, as that would break backwards-compatibility, but mark it as depreciated. It is causing a bug in NS4, when re-sizing the browser with a DynImage in it NS4 crashes, or causes error. It's causing several bugs with IE5, IE6, NS6 for all widgets that use it, where they don't show up on first load (over a server) and only show after refreshing the page. Instead of this we would however want a robust preload code though, so a widget could send the images it needed to the preloader. This would take some thought, as we would want to avoid sending the same image to pre-loading multiple times, when creating several instances of a widget. Cheers, Richard. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordi Ministral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DynAPI-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] dynimage > Someone please convince me it is worth using. Honestly I think that's > forcing things too much: an object that encapsulates the already > existing Image object... > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
