> > 2)I'm no sure I like the format you're using for
> > setSnapBoundary(). IMO I think using something like
> > setSnapBoundary(type,t,r,b,l) would be more flexible:
> >
> > lyr1.setSnapBoundary('inner',10,10,20,20);
> > lyr2.setSnapBoundary('outer',10,10,20,20);Also, during development I have used an undocumented feature. setSnapBoundary() with no args sets all boundaries to a hard-coded default. This was merely for convenience during testing. Would it be of any use to extend this feature to setDefaultBoundary(b), such that any call to setSnapBoundary with no arguments would set all boundaries to this default? Leif ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
