Not sure exactly where these come in to play, but I'm partial to 2) and 3) in that order. Some names might read better depending on categories or types of usage.
Leif ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DynAPI-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:25 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Question about DynAPI Extension Names > Hi everyone, > > I was just thinking about the naming convention used > in DynAPI for Extension libraries and came up with the > following question: > > Which is a better naming convention to use? > > 1) DynLayer_inline > 2) DynLayer_Inline > 3) DynLayerInline > 4) DynLayerINLINE > > I've used started using upper case on some of the > extensions for IOElement (e.g. IOElementSODA) but was > wondering which is best to use as a recommended > standard. > > Which of the above would you recommend? > > -- > Raymond Irving > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
