I am also for number 3. Can we make the switch? If not please state why not otherwise I'll go ahead with the change to:
DynLayerInline IOElementSoda IOElementSync etc... -- Raymond Irving --- Benoit Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Number 3, a winner ! > > Benoit > > On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 03:25 PM, Raymond > Irving wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I was just thinking about the naming convention > used > > in DynAPI for Extension libraries and came up with > the > > following question: > > > > Which is a better naming convention to use? > > > > 1) DynLayer_inline > > 2) DynLayer_Inline > > 3) DynLayerInline > > 4) DynLayerINLINE > > > > I've used started using upper case on some of the > > extensions for IOElement (e.g. IOElementSODA) but > was > > wondering which is best to use as a recommended > > standard. > > > > Which of the above would you recommend? > > > > -- > > Raymond Irving > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
