Sounds very good to me. I think we should also start by making sure that the example pages follow the same procedures used to handle unsupported browsers.
-- Raymond Irving --- Joy Ride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We have been discussin internally about bulletproof > worst case detecting of > browsers. I mean that there should be standard > documented way to detect and > redirect old browsers and browsers thad do not > support advanced features > like Javascript (Lynx) in to worst case page set. > > I know that this isn't really DynAPI issue, but > maybe something in to > documentation and example as well ... (index.html, > which would have > replaceable fields). This would promote good > practise to inform users of old > browsers about problems instead of showing pages > with broken layout and > errors. > > What do you think? > > > - Juho Risku / Helmi Staff > http://www.visualway.com/helmi > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection > with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
