On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Raymond Irving wrote:
Hmmm... maybe not! converting a layer to a loadpanel will 1) add bloated code to DynLayer.prototype that will be used by using in only a few cases. Would anyone have need for 10 loadpanels? IMO I think LoadPanel/LoadLayer should be a widget. In this way we can easily extend the features without having to add mode code to DynLayer.prototype which would affect off DynLayers. Agree?
I agree, the setURL is defined is LoadPanel/LoadLayer , as an extension on dynlayer as well. See LoadLayer.
Benoit
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
