--- Benoit Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Raymond > Irving wrote: > > > Hmmm... maybe not! converting a layer to a > loadpanel > > will 1) add bloated code to DynLayer.prototype > that > > will be used by using in only a few cases. Would > > anyone have need for 10 loadpanels? IMO I think > > LoadPanel/LoadLayer should be a widget. In this > way we > > can easily extend the features without having to > add > > mode code to DynLayer.prototype which would affect > off > > DynLayers. Agree? > > I agree, the setURL is defined is > LoadPanel/LoadLayer , as an extension > on dynlayer as well. See LoadLayer.
Yes I've seen it. My first comment should read: In this way we can easily extend the features without having to add "more" code to DynLayer.prototype which would affect "all" DynLayers. -- Raymond Irving > Benoit > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge > is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind > boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
