I haven't familiarized myself with the TM usage yet, but maybe I can be an
impartial observer.  The [EMAIL PROTECTED] is very easy to find when looking in
code.  I gather you think the new way you suggest could be more powerful
(multi-line?).  How about a compromise and do something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Again, not familiar with the TM code, so a
few questions come to mind to maybe help better understand what you're
trying to do.  Is there a restriction to a single-line embedded field with
the old way?  What are the benefits (in addition to multi-line, if any)
you're trying to reap with the new way?

Leif

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TemplateManager new field format


> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about changing the way we now enter embed
> fields within an html template.
>
> The old way:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The new way:
>
> {fieldname}
>
> {fieldname[
>    This is a multi-line
>    embedded field tex/html block
> ]}
>
>
> Which format do you think is best?
>
>
> --
> Raymond Irving
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
> http://calendar.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

Reply via email to