Retort:
> To bring you up to date we had numerous discussions as to "the next
> evolution" of DynAPI while you were on a brief sabbatical. Grand
> discussions of OOP integration and dynamic Dynbuilders filled the Dev e-mail
> files. The need to integrate Pascal's work was discussed and embraced.
I know... I have been following the DynAPI2 discussions since I first became a member
in August 2000.
> That said, it was also decided to finish this release (think NS6
> integration) before moving on to the next evolution of the API.
I have been working on this, and completed it. I have had time to implement Pascals
design methodologies into the newest release as well.
> I would like to see your efforts evaluated and integrated as well as past
> efforts by others (namely Pascal's) as soon as we finish buffing up this
> release.
Like I said, I have already "beefed up" (I assume you mean squashing any known bugs,
as well as adding NS6 support) this release, as well as implementing Pascals design
methodologies.
> Breaking off to yet another, self-distribution (while providing short-term
> gratification to your own efforts) doesn't really serve the spirit and
> nature of this groups efforts and it tends to confuse and muddle the true
> roots of this API.
Agreed, IF those were my intentions. I only said that I would offer a
self-distribution version IF and ONLY IF, my upgrades/fixes are not welcomed with open
arms (once evaluated and tested)
> Just my thoughts...
> Ray
Thoughts, are what this whole discussion thing is about isn't it. I think that there
would be a lot less childish bickering in this forum if we tried to be a little more
open-minded, and understand the DynAPI and each other more.
--proteanman
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help
