I'm fully aware of your contributions since last August, I was here to.
But to make a statement like this...
> Thoughts, are what this whole discussion thing is about isn't it. I think
that there would be a lot less childish bickering in this forum if we tried
to be a little more open-minded, and understand the DynAPI and each other
more.
after a statement like this...
> Agreed, IF those were my intentions. I only said that I would offer a
self-distribution version IF and ONLY IF, my upgrades/fixes are not welcomed
with open arms (once evaluated and tested)
leads one to ponder is all.
I think we all owe this group pretty solid allegiance and shouldn't place
new ideas on a platter of "welcome them with open arms or... ". Especially
before anyone has even seen the new code.
My first post was just an observation and my perspective related to further
diluting the distribution base of this API, whether sponsored by you or
anyone else.
Laters
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help
