Geoff Harrison wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 04:36:02PM -0500, John R Sheets wrote:
> > By all means, count me in! I stumbled onto E just after 13.x was
> > expunged from existance, and managed to snatch up the E14 demo
> > before it too disappeared (or did it?...so hard to keep all the
> > recent releases and un-releases straight, between E & gnome).
>
> 0.13.3 was the last of my splurges into non 14 code. It's ugly as hell.
> sorry the 0.14 demo disappeared, but there's very likely an 0.14 release
> coming in the near future (yeah yeah I know I always am saying that, but
> it'll happen, I swear...)
I know what you mean. We're currently (at work) in the middle of
a major transition of our entire product line from the nasty v2.0
(written by someone else and buggy as all hell) to a completely
rewritten v3.0. Every time a v2.0 bug comes up, I flinch and
start working harder on v3.0. It'd be nice if we could do the
same, and wipe all v2.0 installs from the map, but our customers
wouldn't like that very much. (c; (We do call center software.)
Say, (off-topic) is there much market, generally speaking, for
X-windows programmers? Or is the demand pretty slim? Is it a
growing field that a renegade Windows programmer might find a
decent home without too much of a paycut?
> > Incidentally, the code for the E14 demo looks very clean &
> > modular. I have no idea what the code for E13.x looked like, but
> > I have a feeling there's no comparison. So, when the time comes,
> > put my name in the hat.
>
> oh 0.13.x was ugly. and it was even uglier before that. we'll be
> looking for some more fulltime coders in the near futre, though.
By "fulltime" do you mean "full-fledged"? (c: Card-carryin'
member?...
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the message contents: unsubscribe e-develop
